Myth 2: Sugary drink taxes would result in job losses
Multiple studies have shown no job losses resulted from taxes on sugar drinks in Mexico and the United States.
This is in contrast to some industry-sponsored studies that try to make the case otherwise.
In Australia, job losses from such a tax are likely to be minimal. Natural Fat Burning Pills Women’S Health. The total demand for drinks by Australian manufacturers is unlikely to change substantially because consumers would likely switch from sugary drinks to other product lines, such as bottled water and artificially sweetened drinks.
A tax on sugary drinks is unlikely to cost jobs. Successo images/Shutterstock
Despite industry protestations, an Australian tax would have minimal impact on sugar farmers. This is because 80% of our locally grown sugar is exported. Easy Ways To Fat Loss Pills For Women.Only a small amount of Australian sugar goes to sugary drinks, and the expected 1% drop in demand would be traded elsewhere.
Myth 3: People don’t support health taxes on sugary drinks
There is widespread support for a tax on sugary drinks from major health and consumer groups in Australia.
In addition, a national survey conducted in 2017 showed 77% of Australians supported a tax on sugary drinks, if the proceeds were used to fund obesity prevention.
Myth 4: People will just swap to other unhealthy products, so a tax is useless
Taxes, or levies, can be designed to avoid substitution to unhealthy products by covering a broad range of sugary drink options, including soft drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks. 2 Best Fat Burning Pills For Women That Work.
There is also evidence that shows people switch to water in response to sugary drinks taxes.